|
ãáÎÕ ÇáÈÍË
ìÎ ÓóÊ Ç ìøÇÚ ÇìÔÔÇß È ØóúÞÊ ÌìÈÇ Ý Ì ìúÈ ÇìÓìÏÇ .õ Ç Óòá )Glossina fuscipes fuscipes( Í Ìó ÏÓÇÓÊ ÇÓÎÌÇÈÊ ÑÈÇÈÊ ÔòÖ Çì ìú
æ ÔòÎÞÇË Epsilon ÇìÔÔß ËòíË ÇìÔäæ Çì Óó )P< ÚÐÏ ÇãÈÔ Úò ìúíÇ ) 0.05 )Biconical( ÇìÔÔß Ë ÇúÆ Çì Îóᆵ ÇáÇÈíØ ÇìÎÞííÐí
ÇÈÐÇå Çì Îóᆵ ÇìÚíìí ÈÔÈäÊ ÓìÏÇÁ Çìíì Çæ ÇÓÎÈÐÇå Çì Îóᆵ ÇìÓÝí ÈÞ ÇóÔ .)Monoscreen( æ ÇÍÇÏí ÇìÓÎÇÓ Vavoua ìøÚ Biconical
Úí ãÝÇÁÉ ÇìÔÔß Ë ÇúÆ Çì ÎóÔæØ. ÎòÔÇÈåÇË Ë ÇúÆ Çì Îóᆵ ÇáÇË ÎúÇ ÇáÇÎíÔÍÇ ÇÚí ãÝÇÁÉ Úò ìúíÇ )P> ËÞíæ ÇÕÓÞ Çìíì ì íÄËÔ Úò ìúíÇ ) 0.05
ÙÐ åÒ ÇìÒÈÇÈÊ Çì ÇúÞíÊ ì ÔóÖ Çì ìú .ð ìøÞÔÌ äòÇÝÍÊ ÔòÖ Çì ìú Ý Ì ìúÈ ÇìÓìÏÇ Úí ÙìÁ Çì ÎúÇÆÌ Çì ÎóÍÕæ ÚííåÇ Nzi ÔÔß )P<0.05(
ÈìÇÓØÊ äòÇÝÍÊ åÒ ÇìÒÈÇÈÊ ÈÇìÔÔß ÇáÇãËÔ ãÝÇÁÉ.
Summary
The response of Glossina fuscipes fuscipes to five trap designs was studied in Juba area,
southern Sudan. The conventional white biconical trap (CWB) caught significantly (P<0.05) more
flies than the triangular Epsilon,Vavoua or monoscreen traps. Changing the upper white-netted
cone with a black netting (BN) and the lower blue cone with a heavy drill blue cotton (HD) did not
significantly (P>0.05) influence the CWB trap catch. These three versions of the biconical trap
(CWB, with BN or with HD) were all significantly (P<0.05) better than the Nzi trap against G. f.
fuscipes. These results are discussed in relation to control of sleeping sickness in southern Sudan by
trapping out G. f. fuscipes.
|